cachinglogo cache

Type: Advocacy

A modified Delphi process to identify experts’ perceptions of the most beneficial and harmful laws to reduce opioid-related harm

States have enacted multiple types of laws, with a variety of constituent provisions, in response to the opioid epidemic, often simultaneously. This temporal proximity and variation in state-to-state operationalization has resulted in significant challenges for empirical research on their effects. Thus, expert consensus can be helpful to classify laws and their provisions by their degree of helpfulness and impact. Overall, experts rated laws and provisions that facilitated harm reduction efforts and access to MOUD as most helpful. Laws and provisions rated as most harmful criminalized substance use and placed restrictions on access to MOUD. These ratings provide a foundation for evaluating the overall overdose policy environment for each state.

How the war on drugs impacts social determinants of health beyond the criminal legal system

While the health impacts of mass incarceration have been explored, less attention has been paid to how the “war on drugs” in the United States exacerbates many of the factors that negatively impact health and wellbeing. This paper examines the ways that “drug war logic” has become embedded in key SDOH and systems. We argue that, because the drug war has become embedded in these systems, medical practitioners can play a significant role in promoting individual and community health by reducing the impact of criminalisation upon healthcare service provision and by becoming engaged in policy reform efforts.

Legal Mapping of Harm Reduction Laws and Overdose Prevention Center Legislation

ASTHO, with support from CDC’s Overdose Data to Action (OD2A) cooperative agreement, developed an interactive resource visualizing state and territorial laws that support harm reduction activities as of January 1, 2023. This report highlights the public health importance of three harm reduction policies and practices to reduce overdoses: Facilitating community distribution of naloxone; Facilitating community distribution of fentanyl test strips (FTS); Overdose prevention centers.

Harm Reduction Laws in the United States

This brief is designed to help individuals and organizations better understand how the legal landscape in their state may impact access to harm reduction services and supplies, including overdose Good Samaritan laws, which provide limited protection from criminal sanctions to encourage people to call for help in an overdose emergency. Specifically, it covers laws related to syringe possession and distribution, naloxone access, statewide naloxone standing orders, and overdose Good Samaritan overdose protections in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Use the embedded hyperlink to navigate to New York!

Preventing opioid overdose with peer-administered naloxone: findings from a rural state

Findings support the feasibility of naloxone distribution to peer opioid and heroin users and provide recommendations for policy improvement, including effective and well-advertised Good Samaritan laws and links to treatment for opioid use disorder.

Estimating naloxone need in the USA across fentanyl, heroin, and prescription opioid epidemics: a modelling study

The US overdose crisis is driven by fentanyl, heroin, and prescription opioids. One evidence-based policy response has been to broaden naloxone distribution, but how much naloxone a community would need to reduce the incidence of fatal overdose is unclear. We aimed to estimate state-level US naloxone need in 2017 across three main naloxone access points (community-based programmes, provider prescription, and pharmacy-initiated distribution) and by dominant opioid epidemic type (fentanyl, heroin, and prescription opioid).

Best practices for community-based overdose education and naloxone distribution programs: results from using the Delphi approach

We utilized a modified Delphi approach to develop a set of best practices for OEND delivery. The top 5 ranked best practices were ensuring that SSP participants have low barrier, consistent, needs-based access to naloxone and that there is ample naloxone available within communities. While the remaining fifteen best practices were deemed important, they had more to do with organizational culture and implementation climate.

Overdose Prevention Centers, Crime, and Disorder in New York City

This cohort study found no significant increases in crimes recorded by the police or calls for emergency service in NYC neighborhoods where 2 OPCs were located. Consistent with the city’s commitment to ensuring clients could use the centers free from law enforcement interference, large, statistically significant declines in police narcotics enforcement around the OPCs were observed. These findings suggest that concerns about crime and disorder remain substantial barriers to the expansion of OPCs in US cities, and initial data from NYC do not support these concerns.

OPC Info

The People Place and Health Collective (PPHC) of Brown University School of Public Health established this website as a nexus for research about overdose prevention centers. It includes a searchable database of all papers published on OPCs plus fact sheets, infographics, and other resources.

Contact your local health department Contact your local health department Job Openings Looking for a job in public health? Job Openings Looking for a job in public health? Donate Donations help support local health departments Donate Donations help support local health departments
NYSACHO is incorporated as a not-for-profit, non-partisan charitable organization with 501(c)(3) tax exempt status.
Skip to toolbar